The WHY-question is legitimate in regard to objects/phenomena.
Conceptually “me” is a man in California,
but experientially “I am” aware of body-mind-world.
A little twist in consciousness with huge implications.
—
“Why” delivers a story.
“What” invites direct seeing.
—
Suffering requires a me-story, a personal-doer.
In the absence of the me-belief there is no sufferer.
>>>
Blah blah?
How does this help to understand/experience that unhappiness is a misunderstanding?
It doesn’t!
… when it is only words in your head.
Instead, ask a living audience at the GardenOfFriends.com.
Leave a Reply